Considered rigorously in empirical terms, law may appear to be a system of coercion: the salient fact about existence under a legal duty to do X is that failure to comply will bring in its wake various penalties. Law seen this way is regarded as a sequence of portents about what judges will do and what events will ensue upon performance of various kinds of action. In the writing of questionable legal realists, a term such as right becomes one with which we describe to each other the prophecies we make of the behaviour of various officials.
A difficulty with realism of this kind is that it offers no satisfactory account of the reasoning processes of those very officials, as they take themselves to be guided by a structure of rights and duties (similarly, if construction that a ball is out of tap is a prediction of what the tennis umpire will do, the umpire cannot in act upon cite the fact of the ball being out of court as the justification of his decision).
In normative terms, law is a system of rules that justifies demands for conformity, and the idea of legal duty is one of being bound by a rule, whether or not it is believably that suffering will follow upon failure to comply. Legal action, such as saying in the right circumstances manner of speaking like I do or I herebyâ¦, creates a different kind of normative relationship between...If you fatality to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment