Rene Descartes believed in doubting every proposition that cannot be cognise with certainty. Albert Camus follows this same lead but unlike Descartes observes that philosophers generally take care to be unable to hold on metaphysical questions, and takes that as a reason to doubt metaphysics all together. His position seems to be profoundly un-philosophical and his interest is purely in how to perish. The primary consider here is that there are no clean-cut answers to every questions, so is it even possible to live with certainty. From The Myth of Sisyphus Camus exclaims in his argument Absurd Freedom of the section An Absurd logical thinking that we cannot be certain about any rational vow or sum in the universe. (Camus, p. 477) This claim in Camus point-of-view comes from the sentience that the greatest Western minds of the past 2,000 years havent been able to agree on a correct answer, and therefore we are marvellous to be able to discover certainty either. Camus admits, I dont endure whether this world has a meaning that transcends it. But I kip down that I do not know that meaning and that it is unrealistic for me just now to know it. (Camus, p.
477) It is my assumption that Camus suggests that perhaps this meaning is knowable, but not without a considerable effort that would embarrass him from actually exercising its living. The present and the succession of presents before a constantly conscious soul is the ideal of the absurd man, I presume he wants to know if he can live with the certainty he has in this present time and with vigor more. (Camus, p. 486)
The absurd man demands certainty above all else, and recognizes that he can only be certain of the absurd. The only justness about himself that remains constant is...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment