Pleasure †Morality Essay

hoagie is an heir of an intellectual movement in England known as Utilitarianism utilitarianism is concerned with the scholarship of pleasure and elimination of fuss. John Stuart Mill follows the guidelines of utilitarianism in order to subside if certain actions ar moral. Utilitarianism states that a person should perform the action that produces the around pleasurable push bycome for every person involved. In order to accurately judge if one pleasure is greater than another, the person essential be unprejudiced and have experienced both such decide bequeath prefer the high pleasures over the lower ones.However, Mill recognizes that deal arent always driven to follow moral social standards, because the reasons behind their actions sess be not and external but intrinsic as well. What Mill means is that expectations of us from our peers and from a higher being, such as God, do not obligate us to follow these rules set out by society it is our own feeling within that h olds us accountable to these standards. Lastly, Mill believes that in order to be a moral creature, we must obey the three check overs of utility 1) Goodness is understood as turnout of happiness, elimination of hurt, 2) for all of those concerned with the action, and 3) each counts for one and no more(prenominal) than one. Utilitarians believe that a persons actions are right if they produce happiness the greatest happiness of greatest number,(Denise, stopcockfreund, and White, p. 158). Michael, jibe and Samir are employees at Initech and are planning scamming the company by installing a computer virus that skims money out of the companys bank account. Mill would look at this action by spirit at the conditions of utilitarianism.Although they meet the first criteria of producing happiness through the elimination of pain by acquiring large amounts of money, they do not meet fork two or three. In regards to part two, it does produce happiness for the ones directly performing t he scam but it indirectly affects the other members working for Initech as well as stakeholders and therefore causes pain for those indirectly affected. Lastly, the third condition to count for one and only one is not met because a passel of people are involved. Mill also considers that in order for an action to be moral, it must come from within.Peter, being the leader of this scam, has no internal morals or considerations for those around him. Michael and Samir are only involved in this scam because they are the brains in this operation and it wouldnt be thinkable to perform this action otherwise. Mill believes that although people are motivated by their own desires and they shouldnt act on them. However, Peter, Michael, and Samir do just that. Mill thinks that when people are excessively fortunate that they are in undefendable of enjoying it because it only benefits themselves.This goes to show that their scam is immoral because it only directly increases their happiness ascri bable to their own self-interests. Also, Mill argues that a person with high capacities will take up more to make him happy and therefore is capable of experiencing larger quantities of pain however, they still shouldnt allow this to lower their expectations and faculties. Although Peter has experienced a prolonged period of pain while working at Initech through tedious tasks and constant pressure from his eight bosses, this should not be a good enough reason for him to affect others faculties and reduce their worth as human beings.Mill says, it is greater to be a man dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, (p. 162). In other words, Peter is not capable of experiencing the highest form of pleasure, and therefore chooses to increase the lower pleasures, lowering his existence in the world. Many people who start off wanting everything which is moral sometimes turn to selfish measures. The reason why so many people end up becoming selfish is due to being in occupations that lower their asp irations of something greater which may be a reason why Michael, Peter, and Samir choose to go through with this scam.They are not unprejudiced judges because they do not know what higher pleasures consist of due to need of opportunity. Considering all of these utilitarian schemes, Mill would argue that although on the surface Michael, Samir, and Peter seem to be acting immorally, they could possibly be unable to accurately judge both the higher and lower pleasures because they were not capable of enjoying the higher pleasures.