The Devastating Impact of Weapons of Mass Destruction :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

The Devastating Impact of Weapons of Mass Destruction A burn mark b all(prenominal) was so bright and vivid overhead. Confusion arose when they realized that it was 815 a.m., and that the sun had already risen that day. The people of Hiroshima remember that day as the day the sun rose twice (Motro). They ran in a state of panic as the images of peoples shadows were burned into the cement. This mayhem happened all beca drug ab spend of the use of a weapon of throne destruction.The definition of a weapon of mass destruction is a device, object, or substance that a person intends to use to cause multiple human deaths (Vernon). According to this definition, things like nuclear, biological and chemical bombs fall into this category. Many people think that, such acts deserve public condemnation(biological weapons). The use of weapons of mass destruction is wrong. They are illegal, morally wrong, mentally disturbing, and the effects of the impact last forever.As far back as documented history can tell humans were using weapons to put to death each other (Ali). When humans first started to make arrows, they were dipping them into animal exorbitance so that the waste would act like poison. Rebehn M.D. writes, The weapon of choice against a civilian enemy became biological, then chemical and nuclear, as soon as scientific advancement and technological development made them available.After conception War II, the Hague convention was signed. This made it illegal to use weapons of mass destruction. The geneva Convention, a nonher official document, was signed in London, Moscow, and Washington on April 10, 1972. This especial(a) Convention prohibited the use and production of chemical and biological weapons. period this particular document makes it illegal, most countries are still accused of fashioning such weapons. Everyone was fearful that the Japanese and Germans were developing such weapons (Ali).In the rules of order that Americans live in, it is not accep table to kill another human being. By using biological or chemical agents, people are doing vindicatory that. Innocent people found themselves caught up in a force struggle for power. The chemical or biological weapons used do not distinguish between soldiers and civilians. Think about little babies with open sores all over them or becoming so sick that they suffer and finally die. The use of a regular bomb would eliminate the suffering that usually occurs after an attack. Furthermore, bombs would not be dropped on civilians anyway.