People Who Need People Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

People Who Need People - Essay ExampleA super social contract theory would depend upon the ideas of Stuart Mill, Thomas Locke, and John Rawis.John Stuart Mills ideas would be helpful in get uping a perfect relationship between the individual and the ground. The state, as an entity of authority, should conk towards satisfying the individuals interests. The state, therefore, should ensure that the individual attains the maximum satisfaction possible while as well minimizing pain an individual faces. For instance, in terms of food, the state should ensure that a citizen becomes satiated. Similarly, the state should minimize starve in the individual. The state, however, only performs these duties as long as the satisfaction of an individual does not compromise on the welfare of other individuals. Besides, the state should define a society form the individuals proclivity rather from the communal view (Jeske and Fumerton 163). The state should bring forth an environment that enable s the individual aline to oneself rather than conform to the society.Thomas Hobbes ideas are crucial in determining the finite capacity of the state in politics individuals affairs. Hobbes defines human beings, in their natural state, as unruly and asocial beings whose interests are rarely unified. This imposes the necessity of the state in harmonizing the interests of individuals. The state, therefore, is a natural consequence of individuals disorganized nature. Eventually, states behave as human beings as they develop asocial nature. In this perspective, the state should be subject to regulations that ensure it operates within responsible confines. Individuals should not consent the state as an entity that cannot err. This is because the state reflects the magnitude of disorganization present in a society. It is essential for individuals to create structures that ensure unrelenting transformation of the state towards perfection.John Rawls theory is essential in rationalizing th e John