Government Abortion Funding

The pro-life gear up opposes presidency support of spontaneous abortions as it opposes abortion itself. Opponents of abortion contend that the foetus is a human life. Some hold that the foetus is a human being from the moment of conception, while others believe that the fetus is only a potential human life simply is still qualified for certain rights and protections (Dworkin, 1993). Some believe the fetus should be given constitutional protection as a human being, and one professor holds that the interests of the fetus apprise already be protected because the government has the authority to protect the interests of animals (Ely, 1973).

 indeed the issue of government keep for abortions pits competing views and rights. Even though the hard roe v. wade decision made abortion legal, it did non domiciliate for abortion on demand as some sight think. "Abortion on demand" has never been the law, though that is what the pro-choice position has demanded and at times what its supporters have insisted is the case. Roe v. Wade did impose some restrictions on the abortion "right," which is thus non a full right at all. The government has taken the position that it can decide non to provide funding for abortions, and Congress has voted several times against funding for abortions. This is the correct position to take for the government, is to make a moral choice that is not truly qualified to make and misrepresents the feelings of a large constituen

Merchant, Carolyn. "Production, reproduction, and Dominion Over Nature." In Redefining sexual Ethics, Susan E. Davies and Eleanor H. Haney (eds.). Cleveland, Ohio: The Pilgrim Press, 1991. 87-96.

The Roe v. Wade decision made abortion itself legal but did not assure that it would be provided. Many of the posterior cases have dealt with questions of government funding for abortions. The dally has sustained statutes that recall funding to poor women who want abortions.

The first of these cases involved a Connecticut regulation that paid for childbirth but not for abortion, and the Court upheld the law reasoning that it did not constrain women's liberty because it placed no obstacles in the pregnant woman's path to an abortion: "As far as the Court was concerned, the legislature had not imposed its will on the woman because it left her empty to find private funds to carry out her wish, though lack of private funds was the precise reason for the woman's industry for government aid" (Kirk, Yudof and Franks, 1986: p. 109). In a second case, the Court refused to overturn a Congressional amendment to Medicaid legislation withholding funding not merely for elective abortions but for those held to be medically necessary as well. Thus, abortion has been found to be a constitutionally protected right, but it is also one that can be limited in various ways. Similarly, the constitution grants life, liberty, and the interest group of happiness, but does not guarantee happiness will be achieved.

Hobgood (1991) discusses the nature of marriage and various restrictions placed on sexuality in our society and finds that society maintains its status quo through the announcement an enforcement of a certain number of romantic myths about revel and monogamous marriage. Men and women are restricted in dissimilar ways within and without the home. Males are expected to deny their materialization of tender and vulnerable emotions, for instance, while females and their reproductive abili
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!