Idealism and Materialism as General Approaches to Understanding Society
Both Karl Marx and Max weber had very variant ways of looking at the
societies stinting establishment. Marxs strong beliefs in what would make rescript thrive were
in the philistinism approach and Webers was in the idealism approach.
Karl Marx debated that the majority of societies problems came from the industrial
capitalist system; this is the system that was making the risque, richer and the poor, poorer,
with the larger portion of society being what Marx called the trade union movement (the poor
laborers)(Macionis/Gerber, 2002,p.94). Marx felt that this was a very poor way to melt a
society and argued that the mickle themselves would have to change it. This however
could prove to be difficult, the proletariats choose some sort of a wage to survive
and take carefulness of their families and the capitalists held the jobs where they could earn that
wage, this puts the poor at an immediate disadvantage and the rich at an advantage. The
capitalists believed that this was not a problem with society and that individuals
themselves were to inculpation for being poor or rich, this is what Marx called false
consciousness (p.95), he did not believe in this as the answer. What he did believe in
was that they were dominating the society by legally protecting their wealth (p.95).
Although Marx felt strongly about his views Max Weber (1864-1920) did too.
Max Weber had a different way of looking at the world; he believed that people viewed
the world through tradition or rationality. Tradition was followed principally by pre-
industrial societies who believed that following the same beliefs and traditions that their
ancestors had followed was the right way to subscribe their lives. Those in the industrial -
capitalist societies took to a rationality approach, which...
If you want to string a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment